Home > PowerPivot > Using Time intelligent PowerPivot functions with fiscal year

Using Time intelligent PowerPivot functions with fiscal year

I had a question by Brad at my Introduction to time intelligent functions in PowerPivot Screencast. He wanted to know if we can use the PowerPivot Time intelligent functions when we have a fiscal year that starts at Jul-Jun in combination with YTD.

The answer to that is: yes we can :) . The DATESYTD function has an optional argument year end date. So you can add the end of the year at the parameter.  This will look like:

 =CALCULATE(
sum(‘Tablix1′[nroforders])
, DATESYTD(‘Date’[Date],”06-01″)
,ALL(‘Date’))

This function will get the sum of nroforders of the entire year until the current month starting at 06-01 of a year, remember the All date that we need to use in CTP3.

This will result in the following pivottable, as I have no data of 2007 in my dataset PowerPivot will starts at 1/1/2008 (first date available) but you see the year starts again in July:

There are a number of other functions you can use this parameter, like nextyear and TotalYtd.

Categories: PowerPivot Tags:
  1. Brad
    February 9th, 2010 at 22:05 | #1

    Thanks Kasper, Thats exaclty what I am after. I have only been looking at powerpivot for 2 days and now am re-thinking our entire delivery platform as I can see many benefits.

  2. Brad
    February 10th, 2010 at 03:11 | #2

    Kasper,
    Sorry accidently posted this in the other article as well.

    Trying to get this working with Australian date format and am having problems.
    In the powerpivot windows I have created the date column and it correct shows the value 1/7/09 as 1-Jul-09. However when I try and use the pivot on the spreadsheet it seems to be interpreting as US format of month/day/year and displays as 7/1/2009.

    Row Labels Sum of Actuals YTD
    7/1/2009 2.01907E-09 0.00
    8/1/2009 3.03544E-11 0.00
    9/1/2009 -2.6148E-12 0.00
    10/1/2009 3.06386E-11 0.00
    11/1/2009 6.82121E-11 0.00
    12/1/2009 4.66116E-11 0.00
    1/1/2010 1.72236E-11 0.00
    2/1/2010 0 0.00
    3/1/2010 2.27374E-13 0.00
    4/1/2010 2.27374E-13 0.00
    5/1/2010 2.27374E-13 0.00
    6/1/2010 2.27374E-13 0.00
    Grand Total 1.52113E-09 2.44995E-11

    My YTD formula is :
    =CALCULATE(sum(‘Query’[Actuals]),DATESYTD(‘Query’[theDate],”06-01″),all(‘Query’))

  3. Kasper de Jonge
    February 10th, 2010 at 16:26 | #3

    @Brad
    Hi Brad,

    Since i’m from the Netherlands we also use the dd-mm-yyyy.
    PowerPivot sees my date as dutch date in the powerpivot window (as does your PowerPivot).

    When i put the date at the pivot table the date will be shown in US format. I cannot make it use the dutch format. I’ll try and figure out how we can achieve this.

    But the good news is that I have created the measure again with the dutch language settings:
    =CALCULATE(sum(‘Tablix1′[nroforders]), DATESYTD(‘Tablix1′[Date],”01-06″),all(‘Tablix1′))
    where 01-06 is the first of january in the dutch format. So this appears to work. I understand this is confusing. The dates should be shown in the native language setting.

    Conclusion: Time intelligent functions use the regional format, but the pivottable doesn’t show it in your regional setting. I’ll see what i can find out regarding the layout.

  4. Brad
    February 11th, 2010 at 05:35 | #4

    Kasper,

    I am still having a couple of problems getting my number correct with this. Could you please email me a sample spreadsheet. if possible. thanks

  5. Brad
    February 11th, 2010 at 22:51 | #5

    Kasper,
    I am getting further and after experimentation I have got the examply you have working.
    My previous problem seems to be related when my fact data comes from a cube. The date coming from the cube is text field with date/time stamps. In powerpivot I use some calculated columns to generate a date column .

    when using data from linked tables in the workbook:
    CalYear CalMonth Sum of Actual DATaYTD
    2008 180 180
    1 10 10
    2 10 20
    3 10 30
    4 10 40
    5 10 50
    6 10 60
    7 20 80
    8 20 100
    9 20 120
    10 20 140
    11 20 160
    12 20 180
    2009 180 180
    1 20 20
    2 20 40
    3 20 60
    4 20 80
    5 20 100
    6 20 120
    7 10 130
    8 10 140
    9 10 150
    10 10 160
    11 10 170
    12 10 180
    2010 60 60
    1 10 10
    2 10 20
    3 10 30
    4 10 40
    5 10 50
    6 10 60
    Grand Total 420 60

    However this raises another problem with I try and present the data by financial year.

    Fin Year Sum of Actual DATaYTD
    FY 2008 60 60
    07 January 10 10
    08 February 10 20
    09 March 10 30
    10 April 10 40
    11 May 10 50
    12 June 10 60
    FY 2009 240 120
    01 July 20 80
    02 August 20 100
    03 September 20 120
    04 October 20 140
    05 November 20 160
    06 December 20 180
    07 January 20 20
    08 February 20 40
    09 March 20 60
    10 April 20 80
    11 May 20 100
    12 June 20 120
    FY 2010 120 60
    01 July 10 130
    02 August 10 140
    03 September 10 150
    04 October 10 160
    05 November 10 170
    06 December 10 180
    07 January 10 10
    08 February 10 20
    09 March 10 30
    10 April 10 40
    11 May 10 50
    12 June 10 60
    Grand Total 420 60

    as you can see the data of actuals is correct however the YTD data now goes very stange:
    any idea’s?

  1. February 10th, 2010 at 22:51 | #1